While rapid antigen tests are still useful for detecting COVID-19 infections, according to a US study, some of these diagnostic kits may be less sensitive to the variants of concern.
“Origins and Development of Rapid SARS-CoV-2 Tests: Insights from Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center”
The rapid tests were developed for use with the original SARS-CoV-2 viral strain that emerged late in 2019 according to researchers at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) in the United States.
Since then, the virus has evolved numerous times, and several dangerous viral variants have emerged, including the highly infectious Delta and Omicron variants that swept the world last summer and winter, respectively.
Using live virus culture in the study
The researchers used live virus culture in the study, which was published in the Journal of Clinical Microbiology, to assess how well four rapid antigen tests detect these COVID-19 variants of concern.
“Focus on Viral Protein: Rapid Antigen Tests’ Approach to Detecting SARS-CoV-2, Notes James Kirby of BIDMC”
James Kirby, director of the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory at BIDMC, a study co-corresponding author said, “Unlike the sensitive molecular tests that detect multiple SARS-CoV-2 genes, rapid antigen tests target a single viral protein.”
In a statement Kirby said, “As the pandemic continues, however, some hypothesise that the performance of available antigen test may vary among the COVID variants of concern.”
Using three strains of cultured live virus, the team assessed differences in the limits of detection (LoD) — the smallest amount of viral antigen detectable at 95 per cent certainty — of four commercially available rapid antigen tests; the Binax, CareStart, GenBody and LumiraDx tests.
The researchers found that all four tests were as sensitive to the Omicron variant, if not more, as they were to original SARS-CoV-2 viral strain, known as WA1
However, three tests showed less sensitivity to the Delta strain, with only the CareStart demonstrating equal detection of all three strains, they said.
“We expect that the observed loss in Delta sensitivity could have resulted in a 20 per cent or more loss of detection in potentially infectious individuals — nevertheless, the most infectious individuals still should have been detected,” said Kirby, also a professor of pathology at Harvard Medical School.
“Adapting Antigen Test Performance for Emerging Variants: A Call for Reevaluation, According to James Kirby”
“However, our findings suggest that antigen test performance needs to be reevaluated for emerging variants to ensure they still meet the intended public health testing goals of the pandemic, he added.
Read More: NHA Extends Incentive Scheme for Digital Health Adoption